What format should I digitize my plentiful, several, plentiful domestic photos (TIFF or JPEG)? At what resolution?
Answer:
Lots of variables here, if you are planning on enlarging photos or freshly want to keep them the resourceful size, it depends on what resolution the were taken at. This take a little experimentation on your segment to find out. Practice with a full size scan pic and enlarge it until you see the photo start to become coarse. If it gets blocky next bump the scan resolution up until you find a happy prevailing conditions. You can scan a pic with too much res or not enuff! When you find this jolly medium you will be set. This would be the wonderful way to scan adjectives your pics. Sending pics is a different story! If you want people to know how to reproduce these pics, you have to transport them at the original res. If you are freshly sending them for someone to view surrounded by e mail, brand name a copy of the original and bump its res considerably.
I suppose JPEG as generally this can be handeld more well and I think is a beter picture standard than the tiff file but I may be mistaken, hey will adjectives make mistakes.
When digitising them I'd use TIFF at the unmatched resolution your scanner will handle. This route you have the best competence image available, even better if you touch-up next to photoshop. These will be needed for printing back, especially englarged.
For copying onto disks and sharing (email?) afterwards you will need a smaller wallet size .JPG version of duplicate file - but don't overwrite the unproved.
TIFF=RAW=Big=depending on space may not FFIT...JPEG works well beside most resizing tools...BMPs and GIFs travel faster...{:-{}.
This is a common request for information posed by those who are digitizing - or for that matter, 'shooting digital'.
The answer is: It depends. Here are some of the factor -
Storage Space: Uncompressed TIFF images are *enormous*. You'll steal up many tens of times as much space as jpgs.
Fidelity: 24 and 32 bit TIFF metaphors provide uncompromising storage of input data ( they dutifully store what the scanner gave them, essentially lacking change ), but JPG metaphors can provide very, completely high exactitude and save a LOT of space, but use what's call a "lossy" compression, which means they drop some information out; the compression algorithm is designed to only drop the background least imagined to be noticed, though.
The upshot, surrounded by my experience, is this: if you save JPG or PNG at their chief quality settings, you won't know how to tell the difference between them onscreen or within reproduction prints when comparing them to the same photograph stored in TIFF format, and you'll hide away a lot of space. NOTE that I said "highest element settings". Make sure your software - such as Photoshop or the like - have a quality setting for JPG descriptions, and set it to "10" or "highest quality" or "largest file". The resulting file will be much larger than it really have to be, but still MUCH smaller than the same depiction in uncompressed TIFF format.
I am surrounded by the process of doing this very project myself, and I'm scan them at 800dpi and saving them as a JPG. TIFF is the "raw" record BEFORE it gets compressed down to be a "jpg". However, if a JPG database is at 2.5MB, that same file as a TIFF could be as glorious as 50MB - 100MB. This would result in a disc full of TIFF files at approaching 6 files per disc.
A lot of people misinterperet the certainty that with a JPG, though nearby is compression, if you scan at a high plenty resolution, (I've found 800dpi is good for viewing, zoom, being competent to take to Walgreens and print, and low adequate file size to fit masses on a CD or DVD) you won't enjoy a problem.
Hope this helps!
For enlarge and resizing, the better format to use is TIFF (Tagged Image File Format). But it doesn't mean JPEG doesn't support that. If you're storing tons many copious photos and will be used to share, i think you should recover as JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) to save disk space. Umm, for conclusion, i ruminate JPEG format is recommended for you.
Related Questions: