Don't appreciate why my frozen drive recitation stays at 100%?
Answer:
If I had to guess consequently I'd say that you never added memory when you go to Vista. Vista is pretty much a resource hog and requires a machine spec'd out adequate to handle the extra strain that Vista puts on it.
If you aren't running around 1Mb of memory with Vista after it's probably using the swapfile on your hard drive to compensate. In that armour you might want to stop using the Aero Glass interface and drop to a more "basic" mode, at least until you draw from more memory. No, it's not as pretty, but you should see a much quieter hard drive.
On the other paw, TalentedChimp may be right: there also could be something using your rugged drive. Just like he say, use "ctrl+alt+del" to get to the Task Manager and see what wallet or process is taking up the most CPU cycles, then destroy it.
...uh.. Vista has profusely of problems. You should have sticked to XP. But I would reason the problem is somehow affiliated with the operating system or some program explicitly running behind the scene. You should check out the duty manager and see which program is occupy the most CPU.
You should have never loaded Vista. You bring almost no benefit.
You might have a virus that is to say making your hard drive run full out - you should probably download and run a free scan.
Your disk is running because something is using it. Find out what it is and wipe out or stop it. Vista needs like mad of resources - a lot of unnecessary services may be running. Use the chore manager to check what's scheduled (ctrl-alt-del? - I use Linux) and stop any that you don't need/want.
A couple of things come to mind... a virus or spyware may have infected your contrivance. Spybot at the link below is free and is justifiably good at finding these things and removing them. The other article that comes to mind is system bloat, which you can blame on Bill Gates and Company. Windoze 98se was to date probably the most stable reworked copy of Windoze and it has a relatively small footprint, but it did hold a problem managing memory as the drive fragmented which would result in the schedule you describe, eventually resulting in huge amounts of disk movement. In W98SE all that intended was you needed to defrag the drive. As the swap report fragments more and more, the more disk activity occur. Maybe there is nought wrong, but the bloated software from Bill...
Related Questions: