Is here a flash drive out in that that's compatiable beside 98SE and ME?
Answer:
Just about any brand of USB pen drive device driver should work. Try this one:
http://www.sandisk.com/assets/file/downl...
You should be capable of go to the flash drive mfg website and download it!
Digitex Pen Drive, Luwen EasyDisk and Transcend USB Flash Drive
By Andrei Kozhemyako
The number of compact USB flash drives keep on growing. A year ago a user was offered solely two devices which had closely of drawbacks. Today we can choose among 10 models which work much faster than the first generation, do not require installation of drivers surrounded by modern operating systems and can easily assuage users as to dimensions, colors and ways of wearing. Besides, the flash memory chips have "outgrown" the USB 1.1 standard, which resources that soon we will witness a new competition among the manufacturer with their high-speed USB 2.0 and FireWire models.
But this will be next, and today I'm going to examine three devices with the USB 1.1 interface. Two of them are not different, we just didn't hold enough time to audition them earlier, and the Luwen's solution is a modification of the elder one.
A couple of words on the testing technique. Despite some problems near the HD Tach revealed last time surrounded by the EasyDisk test, zilch has changed because in attendance are no alternatives. The ZD Winbench 99 measures only a read speed and access time which is not satisfactory: a write speed is also very substantial. Besides, I'm worried about the diagrams of reading for the USB devices - such graphs are exceptional even for hard drives, not to mention the flash memory. But this time I tested adjectives the devices with both programs - and the access times defined by them be identical (WinBench and HD Tach), and the read speed contained by the WinBench is equal to the maximum (not average) obtained next to the HD Tach. That is why the WinBench results won't be shown. As to copying of real files, first of adjectives, the results are easy to predict (if we know an access time and read and write speeds) and secondly, almost irreproducible (thanks to Windows and its unnatural intellect :)), explicitly why it doesn't make sense to wages attention to them. So, I didn't copy files: I had a set of over 1,000 small files and a big one (about 30 MBytes both), but it didn't bring anything significant, and I spoilt to obtain indistinguishable copying time twice (despite my attempts to get one and the same conditions and disabled caching), that is why you won't see these results any.
Related Questions: